Showing posts with label Wrexham. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wrexham. Show all posts

Tuesday, 23 March 2010

20 word match reports - Salisbury and Wrexham

I've had one 20-word match report for each of the last two games, so thought I would combine them into one post.

On our 3-1 win over Salisbury:

Another great result - so I've emailed Wembley about how many bags of yellow pages we are allowed to take in.
- Face (presumably typed while wearing a foam hand)

And on the 2-2 draw at Wrexham on Saturday

Point, another point, but
It felt so much better when
That lovely Marriott fired in.
Those are the best moments.
- Me and the Palmer, get on fine

*To submit your 20-word match report on the Tamworth match tomorrow, email cufcblog@googlemail.com, visit the U's Blog twitter page, or leave a comment under this post.

Read more...

Monday, 22 March 2010

Wrexham: 2 - 2 U's & expungement appeal



Confession time: When I was younger, I used to name Aston Villa as my second team.

I've seen the error of my ways as I've grown older, but when I was at school it seemed acceptable to have a Premiership team with whom to allign myself for the sake of easy playground banter.

I'm not sure why I chose Villa, possibly because like United they never win anything, or because of the funny name/unusual kit. Either way, the 12-year old me used to get quite happy on the rare occasion Savo Milosevic found the net.

Because of my Villa daliance, I was a big fan of Dean Saunders the player. It's a shame then that Saunders the manager is a buffoon of Lewer-esque proportions. Have a listen to this interview carried out following our 2-2 draw on Saturday, he sounds more bitter than a box of lemons.

Anyway, it sounds like it was another good comeback from the U's, and a great equaliser from young Marriott, which you can see above courtesy of youtube fottage king MatBro51. I also notice we've taken the momentous step of overtaking the "biggest club in Cambridge" in the league table, so at least this season hasn't been a complete waste of time.

Speaking of wasting time, United announced on Friday that they are one of ten clubs appealing the decision to expunge Chester from the record books, a move which has led to much righteous indignation amongst users of the CUFC messageboard.

If those within the club feel that strongly about it then it's worth a try I suppose. But seeing as the six points will make little difference to our situation either way I personally don't see the point in us joining in with Oxford, Stevenage, et al in making a fuss. I also don't like our chances of success, as surely the FA will be very reluctant to make a ruling in favour of changing the table for a third time this season.

One thing I do hope is that we're not paying for this appeal in any way. At a time when the fans are trying to find to cash to buy the ground back, I would hate to think the club are wasting their cash on an appeal which is surely doomed to failure.

*To submit your 20-word match reports on the Wrexham match, email
cufcblog@googlemail.com, visit the U's Blog twitter page, or leave a comment under this post.

Read more...

Friday, 19 February 2010

Wicked wicked, the Forest Green match is massive

Old school joke for a Friday afternoon.

Q: Why did the monkey get lost?
A: Coz de jungle is massive




Indeed the jungle may, in the words of M Beat (feat General Levy), be massive, but our game against Forest Green tomorrow is, er, massiver, according to Lingy.

"Whether the Chester points go or not, this is no hiding from the fact that this is a massive game against a team in the bottom four," our leader told the official site, after describing it as "the biggest game of the season" so far. All well and good, but in the same interview he goes to great lengths to stress the importance of taking the pressure off the players during the run in, and I'm not really sure how these two things marry up. Surely describing a game as the biggest of the season is just putting more pressure on? Especially as we're not exactly at crisis point yet. Oh well, I'm sure he knows what he's doing, probably just wants to keep those lazy git players on their toes.

In unrelated news, Wrexham manager Dean Saunders has taken time out from his busy schedule of signing over the hill foreigners and Premier League loan players to appeal for more help in getting promoted.

He said: "As full-time clubs in the Conference we are the teams that everyone else wants to beat yet we sometimes even find ourselves at a disadvantage against part-time clubs.

"I tried to sign a player from one such club a couple of months ago who was earning £350 a week from his football, but was not interested in coming full-time with us because he was also earning £700 from his day job and I could not match that.


"It must surely be in the interests of the Football League that such clubs, hopefully back on an even keel and being run on sensible lines, are given every opportunity to strengthen and improve the quality of the competition in League Two and eventually even higher up in the pyramid."

It's an interesting point he makes, and one that, as a supporter of one of the bigger Conference clubs, I'm sure we can all feel some empathy with. After all, do Macclesfield, Accrington, et al bring more to the football league that Cambridge, Oxford, or Wrexham would? I'd say almost certainly not. But at the same time I don't know exactly what he expects anyone to do about it. Obviously it works both ways, and United or Wrexham are probably more likely to get the signature of a full-time player who might not want to go part-time due to the stigma attached.

And as much as it pains me to say it, the traditional football league clubs currently doing time in the Conference are there on merit, Luton being the only possible exception. And if the big teams are getting outshone by the small ones, they have a look at themselves rather than sit and bleat about what others can do about the situation.

Read more...

Monday, 21 September 2009

U's:2 Red Dragons:0

If you talked to a Man City fan today, they'd probably argue that, after Michael Owen's winning goal in yesterday's Manchester derby, six minutes is a long time in football.

But personally I think they and manager Mark Hughes shouldn't be so ungrateful. So what if the referee's watch was being controlled by Lord Ferguson, at least they got to see their team score three goals in one match. Try going over six hours without a goal, then you've got a reason to complain. These pampered Premiership types don't even know they're born, hmph.

Anyway, yeah, United got back to winning ways on Saturday with a supremely comfortable victory over a woeful Wrexham outfit. Dragons boss Dean Saunders doesn't seem to be the brightest button, having replaced last season's underperforming bunch of premier league youngsters and dodgy foreign imports with, er, another bunch of premier league youngsters and dodgy foreign imports. Big name managers eh, they never learn.

I didn't have to wait long for Wayne Hatswell to end my goal drought. Nine minutes had elapsed when Mani, who has grown a lot since he was in The Stone Roses, chopped down Holroyd just outside the box. Hats took responsibility for the resulting free kick, driving a gently but accurate daisy cutter under the wall and into the corner. Perhaps the Chris Maxwell in the Wrexham goal should've done better, but let's not pick holes, a goal's a goal. 1-0.

Wrexham had already wasted what turned out to be their best chance of the half, with Nathan Fairhurst guiding a diving header over the bar, and other than that it was all United. Willmott drew a superb save from Maxwell with a curling free kick, while Holroyd should have tucked away a low Tonkin cross, but instead guided his shot into the grateful keeper's arms. Referee Kinesley showed himself to be a fairly competent official, but missed an off the ball kick by Mani on Willmott which could have resulted in the big defenders dismissal. Just before half time it could have been 2-0 when Brian Saah climbed to meet a corner from the left, but put his free header just wide.

The visitors were employing a 3-5-2 formation which I always think can be an effective way to play at this level. Their extra midfield man led to them having plenty of second half possession, as United retreated further and further back, with Reason and Carden joining the defenders to form what was virtually a back six. Although this led to a few heart-in-mouth moments, the sheer mass of bodies between Wrexham and Danny Potter's goal meant that Saunders men were reduced to wild efforts from distance. Eventually they switched to a 4-4-2 set up, but this just seemed to play into United's hands, with more and more space becoming available for the likes of Willmott and Holroyd to roam into.

And it was the winger who settled the game with ten minutes to go, picking up a pass from Danny Crow, and cutting in from the left flank to beat Maxwell inside his near post with a low shot. Again Robbie was a peripheral figure for much of the game, and you have to hope that the (hopefully) imminent return of Pitt will see return to the right flank where he is at his most dangerous. Beesley could have added a third at the death, but saw his shot blocked by Neil Taylor.

And so ended a game in which United were never overly stretched, but conversely never looked totally convincing. The defence is solid as ever, but in the second period we spent a lot of time on the back foot, and if we play a similar game against the better teams in the division I think we may run into problems.

Man of the Match: Brian Saah – What a signing, immaculate at the back in tandem with Hatswell.

Read more...

Friday, 23 January 2009

Dragons:2 U's:0

The world of football has seen plenty of tactical innovations over the years, from the favoured pre-war line up of 2-3-5, to 4-4-2, to the current en vogue formation of 4-5-1, via wing backs, sweepers, and plenty more besides.

But I doubt any of the globes most creative soccer thinkers have come up with a formation as bizarre as that employed by the Brabinator in last nights game. We were tokenly playing 4-3-3, but it more resembled a lop-sided 4-4-2 set up, with Willmott roaming down the right flank and, er, no one patrolling the left.

It's hard to know where to begin with the difficiencies of this line up, and I don't quite comprehend what the Brabinator was thinking. It was obvious we were going to get over run in midfield (it was virtually four against two, with Willmott doing no defensive work of note), and up front he chose an unbalanced combination of strikers; with Rendell leading the line we needed one of the others to drop deep and the the third to stretch the defence. As it was, both Crow and Beesley were wanting to occupy the same space, and the team was crying out for some of Holroyd's pace, which wasn't injected until all was lost.

But it would be wrong to direct all the blame at the manager when none of the players covered themselves in glory either. Potter looked as though he could've done better on both goals, the defence were sluggish and gave their opponents far too much space, midfield was weak and up front the three strikers seemed to keep getting in others way.

United weren't actually playing too badly until an unimpressive yet hard working Wrexham outfit took the lead. Marc Williams, who was by far and away the best player on the pitch in the first half (he faded a bit in the second), played the ball into Jon Brown, whose low shot clipped the heels of Tonkin and flew into the far corner, with Potter a mere spectator.

Rendell scuffed a shot wide from close range, but other than that chances were few and far between at either end, although Wrexham could have had a penalty when the otherwise annonymous Jefferson Louis appeared to be clipped in the box by Hatswell. Louis, who always seems to score against us, had the last laugh though, when he netted the second. Tonkin and Hatswell both failed to clear their lines with headers, and a scuffed shot from the edge of the box came through a sea of legs to Louis, who turned it in from close range. Game over.

When the U's finally did fashion a clear opportunity it went begging. Holroyd chipped a cross over to fellow sub Jardim who, with the goal gaping, headed disappointingly over the bar. Why is it that we save our worst misses for live televised games?

So all in all a complete shambles. The Brabinator has spent the last few weeks complaining that he doesn't have any players, but when he does have a full(ish) squad to choose from it seems he can't be relied upon to select the right team. Of course he's a young manager, and as such can be forgiven for making mistakes, but he needs to show he's learning from them as well.

Man of the Match: Er, I'll come back to you on that one...

Read more...

Tuesday, 9 September 2008

U's:2 Wrecsam:2 - In the wilderness


Hi folks, I’m back from the wilderness, or to give it its other name, Jersey. As I mentioned previously, I was at a wedding over the weekend, but was hoping to be able to keep up with news of the match via text.

However, this plan went horribly wrong when I arrived in the Channel Islands and discovered that – quelle catastrophe – my phone didn’t work. So for the first time in ages I went through the whole of Saturday completely oblivious to goings on at the Abbey, until returning home in the early hours of Sunday to a note from my girlfriend’s uncle (with whom we were staying): “Matt – Camb United win 2-0 and go top of the league!”

Good old Uncle Stuart, I have a new found respect for him now. Anyway, sounds like we played really well in my absence. And, in an interesting parallel with this time ten years ago, we did it playing 4-3-3. Now as then our front line is full of guile (Beesley/Butler), experience (Evil/Shaggy), youthful exuberance (Holroyd/Benjamin) and most importantly goals. Lets hope that this time around the end result is the same as it was in 98/99.

In other news, Phil Law is gone, which is probably not a bad thing. I don’t know the guy, and suspect that some of the stick he has taken from the keyboard warriors on the messageboard is a bit OTT. However, anyone who was at the fans forum will know he lied concerning the matter of the £2000 supposedly offered by Brian York to cancel the City match – first stating there was no truth in the rumour then by the end admitting it was true but suggesting it had been taken out of context. Whether this was motivated by some alternate agenda or was simply because he’s a bit of a buffoon I don’t know, but either way, I think it was one cock up too far from a man who’s made a plenty of them lately.


And congrats to the club for taking the mature step of threatening to remove the messageboard (although, bizarrely, it's still there, just without links from the main page). Very professional, and not at all reminiscent of the stick-your-fingers-in-your-ears-and-hope-it-goes-away stance Histon Village took regarding Craig Pope.

Meanwhile, it seems we are trying to entice Danny Crow to the Abbey. The former P*sh striker watched Saturday’s match from the directors box with George Rolls, leading our Director of Football to remark to the CEN that “If Ronaldinho was there, he'd have been impressed. I think Danny was quite shocked by the level of the football.” Never one to over-egg the pudding is our George, oh no.

But I’m pleased to read we won’t be breaking the bank to get him here. While Crow is a talented player, we don’t desperately need another striker, and it would be a shame to upset the balance of the squad when Evil, Beesley, and now Holroyd, are all playing well.

Read more...

About This Blog

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP